Thoughts on the recent South Bow Keystone pipeline incident

Integrity data doesn't do any good if it's not trending

On April 8, 2025, a rupture in the Keystone Pipeline near Fort Ransom, North Dakota, released approximately 3,500 barrels (147,000 gallons) of crude oil onto an agricultural field. Operated by South Bow Corp., this vital pipeline transports Canadian crude to U.S. refineries, supporting North America’s energy needs. The incident, while contained, raises questions about pipeline integrity and the industry’s ability to prevent spills. Here’s a breakdown of what happened, the response, and a dive into why such incidents persist despite years of data.

Quick recap of the incicdent

At 7:42 a.m., South Bow’s control center detected a pressure drop, triggering an immediate shutdown of the affected pipeline segment, known as the MP-171 (MP=mile post) spill. The oil was confined to an agricultural field, with no reported risks to public health or waterways. South Bow deployed over 200 workers, recovering 700 barrels (20%) of the spilled oil by April 10. The damaged pipe was excavated, replaced, and sent to a Houston lab for metallurgical analysis to determine the cause, which remains under investigation.

The U.S. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) issued a Corrective Action Order (CAO) on April 11, requiring South Bow to operate at reduced pressure, conduct a root cause analysis, and review 10 years of inspection data for potential system-wide issues. PHMSA approved a controlled restart on April 15, and the pipeline resumed operations on April 16. South Bow is now remediating the affected farmland under 24/7 monitoring, with PHMSA investigators on-site in North Dakota and at the company’s Calgary control room

Response and industry context

South Bow acted decisively, isolating the rupture and mobilizing resources to mitigate environmental impact. Their cooperation with PHMSA, including compliance with the CAO’s stringent requirements, reflects a commitment to resolving the issue. The Keystone Pipeline, a ~2,700-mile system built in 2010, moves 600,000 barrels of oil daily, making it a cornerstone of U.S. energy security. Despite previous spills in 2019 and 2022, South Bow’s use of advanced monitoring like pressure sensors and inline inspections likely enabled rapid detection and response. PHMSA’s oversight ensures that the ongoing investigation, including third-party audits and lab testing, will drive safety improvements while balancing the pipeline’s critical role in the economy.

From Nate’s brain… why didn’t they catch this?

As I dig into this incident, I can’t help but wonder: with 10 years of inspection data, why didn’t South Bow spot the weak link at MP-171? Let’s look at the possibilities.

First, there’s the data overload problem. The Keystone Pipeline generates a firehose of inspection data… think millions of readings from smart pigs, pressure logs, corrosion scans, and more. Sifting through that to pinpoint which dent or weld is a ticking time bomb is like finding a needle in a haystack. South Bow’s risk models might have flagged some issues after the 2019 and 2022 spills, but if the MP-171 segment looked “within spec” (like minor corrosion below action thresholds), they might’ve monitored it rather than digging it up. Hindsight’s brutal and from the looks of it, those models clearly missed something.

Then there’s the regulatory angle. PHMSA sets the rules, and South Bow likely checked all the boxes: regular inspections, pressure tests, the works. But compliance isn’t the same as foresight. The CAO’s demand for a 10-year data review suggests PHMSA thinks South Bow might’ve overlooked patterns like recurring weld issues or corrosion hotspots that didn’t scream “urgent” until now.

Economics probably played a role too. Keystone’s 95% of South Bow’s 2024 earnings, and shutting down segments for preemptive repairs isn’t cheap. With oil prices wobbling in 2025 and the TC Energy spin-off last year, South Bow might’ve leaned toward targeted fixes over a system-wide integrity overhaul. If the data showed “manageable” risks, they’d keep the oil flowing. It’s a business call that makes sense until an unfortunately pipe burst.

Don’t sleep on tech limitations either. Inline inspection tools are impressive but not perfect; they can miss hairline cracks or localized defects, especially in a 15-year-old pipeline. The Houston lab’s metallurgical tests might reveal a manufacturing flaw or sneaky corrosion that slipped past the pigs. If that’s the case, South Bow wasn’t negligent; they were just using the best tools available.

Finally, there’s the human factor. Risk assessments depend on engineers and analysts interpreting data, and let’s face it… nobody can see into the future with 100% certainty. The 2019 and 2022 spills led to fixes, but South Bow might’ve underestimated broader vulnerabilities, assuming prior incidents were isolated. The MP-171 rupture could be a wake-up call that their approach was too reactive.

PHMSA’s investigation will tell us more--maybe a material defect, maybe a misread anomaly. For now, I’m betting on a mix of factors: data that didn’t raise alarms, economic pressures, and tech that’s good but not bulletproof. It’s a reminder that even critical systems like Keystone are only as strong as the humans and tools behind them.

Here’s why it matters

The MP-171 spill highlights the delicate balance of maintaining aging infrastructure while meeting energy demands. Pipelines like Keystone are lifelines for economic stability, especially with global oil markets under strain. South Bow’s rapid response and PHMSA’s rigorous oversight show the industry’s capacity to manage incidents, but the investigation’s findings will be crucial. If the spill points to systemic issues, it could spark smarter maintenance strategies, better tech, or tougher regulations—without disrupting the energy supply chain.

As remediation continues, the focus is on restoring the affected farmland and ensuring Keystone’s reliability. The spill is a bump in the road, not a derailment, for an industry that powers millions of lives.

Sources: PHMSA Corrective Action Order (CPF 3-2025-018), PHMSA Keystone Pipeline Updates.

---

If you value this article, please consider becoming a paid subscriber - only $8/month.

What’s your take… how can pipelines stay ahead of failures? Drop a comment!